Russian Software Integration
Transition to Russian software without losing processes or data: landscape audit, selection of alternatives from the registry, migration roadmap, pilot, and organization-wide rollout.
- Госсектор
- Крупный бизнес
- МСБ
Без обязательств: сначала разбираем ситуацию, затем предлагаем формат работы.
What you get
- Audit of current software in 2–4 weeks. Inventory of products in use, dependencies, and assessment of replacement risks.
- Selection of Russian alternatives. Comparison by functionality, cost, and support, including verification against the Russian software registry.
- AI compatibility analysis. Before migration begins, we predict problem areas: formats, macros, integrations, and peripherals.
- Migration planning. A transition roadmap with minimal risk of downtime.
- Pilot implementation. Testing the new software at individual business units and working through typical scenarios.
- Full migration and training. Data transfer, organization-wide cutover, and managing user resistance.
Results in numbers
Cost depends on the number of workstations, the composition of systems, and the complexity of integrations. Benchmarks for a typical transition project:
| Format | Price | Timeline | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audit and transition roadmap | on request | 2–4 weeks | understanding of the scope of work and replacement priorities |
| Pilot implementation | on request | 3–6 months | validation of the alternative at a business unit before full cutover |
| Full migration | on request | 12–24 months | organization-wide cutover with data transfer and training |
Expected result: within 3–6 months, the pilot business unit is running on Russian software; within 12–24 months, the entire organization has been migrated, with compliance documentation provided.
Entry rule: we start with an audit and transition roadmap — it reduces the risk of downtime and helps prioritize replacements.
Why us
- Real migration experience. Cases in the public sector and industry. Evidence: cases with migration timelines and number of workstations.
- AI compatibility analysis. We predict problem areas before kickoff. Evidence: partner statuses with Russian vendors.
- Vendor partnerships. MyOffice, Astra Linux, Postgres Pro. Evidence: list of completed public-sector projects.
- Change management. We address user resistance: training, FAQs, and quick wins.
- FSTEC compliance. We know the requirements and can meet them in CII environments.
- Gradual transition. Not a "big bang," but iterative migration with checkpoints.
Who it's for
For whom this quickly resolves the issue:
- CIO / IT director at a government agency — the task to "switch to Russian software by the deadline" came from above; you need a roadmap that won't stop operations and will meet registry requirements.
- IT director at an industrial enterprise — the enterprise is classified as CII, the regulator requires a transition; you need migration without halting production and in compliance with FSTEC requirements.
- SMB executive — not obligated, but wants to reduce dependence on foreign software and save on licenses; interested in migrating from Microsoft 365 to MyOffice while preserving familiar workflows.
When this isn't your case
- A one-off replacement without migration. If you need to replace a single product without data transfer or training, a large-scale project is overkill — we'll suggest a lighter path.
- You're not ready for a pilot and phased transition. A full "one-day" migration across the entire organization increases the risk of downtime — that's not how we work.
- There's no clear requirement or understanding of why to switch. If no regulator requires the transition and you don't want to change your stack, we'll first honestly assess whether it makes sense.
- Critical legacy systems without documentation. If no one has documented the processes, we first bring order, then migrate.
Where to start
The primary step is a free audit and transition roadmap. We clarify the system landscape, dependencies, and risks before you pay. You get a plan: which replacements can realistically be implemented first and where compatibility issues are likely.
The secondary step is a pilot at a separate business unit over 3–6 months, which shows where the alternative works and where refinements are needed.
Then, down the line — after the transition, we add integration and AI consulting so the new stack works with CRM, ERP, and automation as a single whole.
[Get a transition roadmap] · [How we select an alternative from the registry] · [1C and CRM integration — the next step]
FAQ
Where's the best place to start if we're thinking about switching to Russian software?
Start with an audit of the current landscape: inventory of software, dependencies, and risks. This determines the transition roadmap and replacement priorities without unnecessary costs.
How long does a transition usually take?
A pilot at a business unit takes 3–6 months; a full organization-wide cutover takes 12–24 months. The timeline depends on the number of systems and workstations; we divide the work into stages with checkpoints.
What has the biggest impact on cost?
The number of workstations, the composition of legacy systems, the complexity of formats and integrations, and security requirements. At the assessment stage, we fix the project scope and acceptance criteria.
Can we start with a pilot?
Yes. A pilot at a separate business unit is a mandatory part of the roadmap: it shows where the alternative works and where refinements are needed, before you migrate the entire organization.
What should we do if employees resist the transition?
We address resistance systematically: training, clear instructions, quick wins, and gradual onboarding. Migration experience shows that with proper change management, the transition goes more smoothly than management expects.
Some of our formats and macros don't work in the alternatives. Is that a problem?
We predict these areas in advance through AI compatibility analysis and factor them into the roadmap. Some issues are resolved through refinements or maintaining compatibility — you know the risks before kickoff, not after implementation.
---
Не нашли ответ? Обсудить задачу
Regulatory context
- Presidential Decree No. 250 (May 2022). Organizations with critical information infrastructure are required to switch to domestic software.
- Decree No. 166. Ban on the use of foreign software at critical infrastructure facilities starting January 1, 2025.
- Government Resolution No. 1236. Russian software registry: government agencies use software from the registry when a Russian alternative exists.
- Government Resolution No. 1997. Advantages for Russian software in public procurement.
- FSTEC requirements. For CII facilities and government systems, compliance with information protection requirements is mandatory.
Обсудим вашу задачу без лишнего риска
На первом шаге разберём ситуацию, покажем, где эффект, а где риски, и предложим формат работы под ваш масштаб.
Ответим в течение 1 рабочего дня. info@right-digits.ru